Criminological Theories in Crime Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Criminological Theories in Crime - Essay ExampleThe criticism of the theory is mainly based on the claim that there is nothing like a criminal gene. However, certain(a) evidences stick been put forward in recent meters to show that genetics are a solution of criminal behavior. This paper will explore the merits of the idea that genetics are a source of criminal behavior. It will also examine the strengths and weaknesses of the evidences surrounding genetics and crime. The essay will then present at whether the police departments should consider or dismiss the findings. Finally, the paper will explore the dangers of believing in the existence of a criminal gene, as well as the consequences the existence of the gene may have in the field of criminal justice system. Namazi (2010) notes that there is a divided opinion regarding the role of genes in criminal behaviors. However, rough research conducted in the past has suggested that genes contribute largely to criminal behaviors am ong individuals. What these studies suggests is that, a boor whose farther happens to have been a criminal, is most likely to become a criminal in the prospective due to genetic regularise. Despite having been refuted by some theories that maintain that there is no criminal gene, the replicate and adoption theories provide a good connection between genetics and criminal behaviors (Cassel and Bernstein, 2007). ... For example, a training conducted by Christiansen in Demark, found out that genetics plays a vital role in influencing the offense (Cassel and Bernstein, 2007). In conducting the study, Christiansen surveyed a population of 3,586 twin pairs. From the study, Christiansen found 52% of the twins concordant for criminality for male-male same twin pairs and 22% concordant for male-male fraternal twin pairs (Cassel and Bernstein, 2007). This evidence suggested that identical twins inherit some biological characteristics, which increases their risk of being registered for c riminal behaviors. A similar study conducted in the United States and Sweden showed a higher concordance for criminality amongst MZ than DZ twins did (van Dusen and Mednick, 1983). This studies support the claims that genetics influence criminal behaviors amongst individuals in society. several(prenominal) adoption studies conducted in 1970s and 1980s have also provided convincing evidence that genetics influence criminal behaviors. According to adoption studies, having a parent who have been imprisoned at one time increases an individuals risk of getting a criminal conviction when the person grows up careless(predicate) of whether the person is brought up by pro-social, law-abiding, and genetically unrelated relatives. The adoption studies established that genetic effects on criminality are important for both sexes. However, the genetic risk was found to be higher for distaff than male offenders were (Mednick, Gabrielli and Hutchings, 1984). Regarding an adoptive study conducted in the U.S., Mednick, Gabrielli, and Hutchings (1984) noted an increased rate of criminality in 42 Iowan adoptees with criminal biological mothers. Another study conducted by Mednick, Gabrielli and