Hamlet, why is this an optimistic play Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Hamlet, why is this an positive dally - Essay ExampleAll the schemers and morally corrupt persons are dead. Fortinbras, the king of Norway will now endure over Denmark, and its people can expect peace and prosperity, after the unstable period of palace intrigues. Hamlet, himself, though being an upright teenage man, was not politically inclined, and would not have made a profound king for Denmark. So, though his untimely death is a personal tragedy, it seems inevitable that this had to happen in the bigger interests of political stability. Amidst the death and destruction, it is also heartening that Horatio is alive-he lives to relate the story of Hamlet to the new king, Fortinbras, and to the world.There is a sense of poetic equitableice when the denouement of the knead is unraveled. The schemers have got what they deserved, especially King Claudius who has killed his brother, Hamlet (Father of the protagonist-the young Hamlet) and married the Queen Gert unprocessed for polit ical gain, and the Queen herself, who for personal security and power married her brother-in-law so readily, just weeks after her economise was slain.If we narrow the spotlight to examine Hamlets personal actions in the play, there is reason for optimism too. ... rude for political gain, and the Queen herself, who for personal security and power married her brother-in-law so readily, just weeks after her husband was slain.If we narrow the spotlight to examine Hamlets personal actions in the play, there is reason for optimism too. Hamlet has generally been seen as an indecisive person, who, though he knew that his father had been killed by his uncle, Claudius, did not take action to avenge his death. This, however, is a simplistic interpretation. Think of this. Hamlet is generous enough in giving Claudius the benefit of doubt. The crime that he has committed has no living witnesses. Yes, the weirdo of Hamlets father does inform him of the dastardly deed. But how can he believe in t his without any other evidence How can he be sure that this ghost is not some evil spirit come down to merely confuse and mislead him The communicate that we get is the one that is enshrined in the judicial systems of most democracies in the world today Presume that a person is innocent unless he is proved guilty. The play, therefore, is not a typical revenge play. (Eliot, 1922) We must understand that the play deals with the complexity of human action, and the difficulty in ascertaining the correctness of an action. To the extent that the play acknowledges that we cannot simplistically classify an action as black and white, and that a vast gray exists, it is more realistic and to the extent that it is more realistic, it may be considered optimistic, as it believes in the innate goodness of a person, and the mistake we could make in sitting in judgment on anyone-however wicked he may appear to be.This play contains some of the most optimistic lines ever written-asserting belief in the innate goodness of