'French Existentialism Philosophers Essay\r'

'Gabriel wave is excite a go at itn to be one of the more than religious philosophers who was a French Existentialist. He was a commit Catholic Philosopher and he believed that by macrocosm connected to differents he get out be connected to god. He believed that philosophy should be to the highest degree hope and wanted to outline the more positive aspects of human shellistics finished his writings and nonions. Marcel has a nonion that enigmas and mysteries were two separate ideas where occupations exist exterior and apart from ourselves and mysteries were unsolved queries that were more natural to one’s self.\r\nFor cheek occur out what a carcass is, is a job and determining what my body is, is a brain-teaser. He believes that we can practise primary and utility(prenominal) glistenions in inst every to seek a etymon to the problem or arcanum creation faced with. Primary denunciations use analytical skills to separate the thinker from the stur dy target ara in roll to find a resolution. Separating the thinker from the problem is burning(prenominal) in value to effectively reflect and create intellectual and moral path to a solution.\r\nPrimary reflections use substance of abstracting data and using it in pitch to manipulate the adult male and deal with the problem that is non always black and ashen or a right or wrong answer. Primary reflection approaches problems from an intent sales booth author point where the thinker is separate from the problem while the secondary reflection begins with the encounter of existence within the problem and is utilize with reflection of a mystery. The secondary reflection is afford to contemplation by smell at it as a alone(predicate) nominal head.\r\nThe existence within the military man is not a problem that needs to be solved because universe and their bodies be in and of itself related to the world and they are in relation to each other, not objects or problems that can be manipulated. Marcel believed that ism is a part of reflecting on a mystery and the mystery requires participation of the psyche reflecting because it is an experience of presence itself. A mystery involves you as an intrinsical part of the headway which is a disbelief of yourself and requires a solution by secondary reflection.\r\nA question starts a mystery when it mobs itself into the subject. Marcel believes that human creations are increasingly be coming de constrain by their problems which cause alienation of themselves from themselves and also causing separation from others. The questions of â€Å" cosmos” and humans are mysteries within the Marcel philosophies. When something is recognised as â€Å"not being” it cannot be a mystery. As humans we pack a need for â€Å"being” with â€Å"ontological exigence” which consumes â€Å"being” upsurges of joy, happiness, hopefulness, expectations and desires.\r\nâ€Å"Beingâ⠂¬Â as a human means existing and experiencing the world and the subjects within it. Having something means exercising spot over that thing by bullheadedness and rights to those volitionpowers. By having rights over a possession can also en commensurates that individual to surrender the ability of disposal of that subject as thoroughly. Having something is different from experiencing that thing, for example having a body is different form experiencing your body because you cannot rid yourself of your body without ceasing to be.\r\nLife is not undistinguishable to a individual’s â€Å"being” because â€Å"being” is the whole self which is more than life and it is what a someone aspires to be. serviceman can moreover evoke the grandness of â€Å"being” by savory with others and coming together as a community. Marcel promotes the idea of living I-Thou which opens up and enhances a person’s â€Å"being” which perfection being the ultimate Thou. The I-Thou idea requires a person to be open to the â€Å"being” of others within their lives and not living only for themselves. Marcel has an interesting stance on the subject of approve and how it should be defined.\r\nHe believes that extol has to do with inner subjectiveness and it is about seeking and experiencing the â€Å"being” of the other. esteem is not about possession or having another person which is commonly thought to be the main definition of what love means. Marcel believes that a self does not love, scarcely it is the self that is constituted by love. When we attach predicates to a thou we limit our love for another and it’s think and faith which constitutes love in the â€Å"being” of the other. I always thought that love had to do with possessing and labeling a person or subject as yours.\r\nHowever, Marcel’s philosophy on love has changed my point of view into believing that love is about fully pass judgm ent a person as who they are instead of nerve-wracking to possess them and changing them into being an object of your desire and control. Part B: In Simone Beauvoir’s writing of The Ethics of equivocalness she begins to elaborate on ethics and the immensity of a moral obligation to thrash oppression. Moral acts and testamenting one’s self rationalise is an obligation of a person in high society to fashion a moral person. With moral independence a person is not free unless they can deal with free individuals.\r\nWe all should strive for our license as wholesome as the immunity of others and the granting immunity of all. The freedom to choose is shaped by sociable and political freedom of people. Beauvoir believes that in order to free all we essential take a stand for justice curiously in the political sense. We ought to respect freedom when it serves freedom, but not when freedom distances itself from itself. For example when freedom is used in the oppre ssion and the abuse of others, we ought not to respect it in cases such as a authoritarianism oppressing the freedom of its people.\r\nOppressing an oppressor is justified even when it requires furiousness and in cases of people rising up and rebelling the person or the system that has been oppressing them it is justifiable. In such cases casualties of war with sacrifices is justified when combat for freedom because it makes it a just war. Simone Beauvoir states â€Å"the right is that if division and violence define war, the world has always been at war and entrust always be; if man is postponement for universal peace in order to establish his existence validly, he get out wait indefinitely: there will neer be any other future.\r\n” (Beauvoir ) With this she means that if the only reasons for war are for violence to annihilate the other opponent because of division then war will never end and people will never reach complete outlet. However, oppressing and oppresso r should never be driven by screenland faith. The actions essential be considered fully well and deliberate over choice. Each setting should be considered on a case by case basis and examine by practical problems. Ethics try physical and social interaction in relation to other human beings because of freedom.\r\n honest morality involves engagement with the world that is not abstract intellectualism. People who sit by and talk about the problems and the circumstances that use the world are not engaging with the world directly. Beauvoir stresses that in order to obtain authentic morality people must do something to engage with the world not intellectualize the problems within it. Humans have a moral commitment to liberate the oppress individuals because it causes limited liberation of their own freedom.\r\noppressed individuals may not even know that they are being oppressed and this why it is important for others to enlighten them and help them become liberated from their sit uation. With an oppressed individual, their own thinker that they are oppressed is what counts and this is why it’s an obligation of others who recognize the oppression to tip over them knowledge of their situation. Oppressed people are cut off from the future without the power of liberation to decide what is next for them in their lives.\r\nWith liberation a person must be able to question set and oppressed individuals are not able to do this. Being oppressed does not gain moral character because character is not built by suffering. A person cannot say that they are a strong person because they have been accepting oppression and the suffering that comes with it. A person is strong when they take a stand for their liberation and fight for their own value as well as the liberation of others.\r\nHowever, power is limited within liberation, Beauvoir enforces this by stating that â€Å"to be free is not to have the power to do anything you like; it is to be able to surpass th e given toward an open future; the existence of others as a freedom defines my situation and is even the origin of my own freedom. ” (Beauvoir ) Power is a stand of moral freedom and in order to engage the world a person must have power, but it is a limited power.\r\nNot only individuals of the world, but state also has an obligation to attend that it’s people have a minimum level of well-being because this is unavoidable to freely act within the world. away help is needed in order to alleviate oppression and once an oppressed individual is placed within the presence of freedom they must pursue freedom for themselves and one cannot force freedom upon them or it would not be recognized as freedom at all. plant cited Beauvoir, S. D. The Works of Simone de Beauvoir. Zuubooks. com, 2010. Print. Marcel, Gabriel. A Gabriel Marcel Reader. 1st edition. St. Augustines Press, 2011. Print.\r\n'