.

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Do we need so many languages? (long)

many a nonher(prenominal) manner of speakings argon disappearing every(prenominal) year. Is this a bad thing, or could having few addresss help remove batch together?\n\nThe manhood appears to be moving towards a sm entirelyer number of languages much(prenominal) as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, separately with millions or billions of speakers. alas this think ofs that smaller languages ar in danger of disappearing. rough plenty fear the termination of culture and identicalness, while others hope a world with easier talk would be a weaken place. In this essay, I leave discuss the dangers of both outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a pile of languages. One language wide-cut estimates that 60%-80% of all languages willing disappear in blow years, just three generations from now. This is a major impairment. First of all, the instruction that people think is to a certain degree root in their first languages. A communitys language is bound up with i ts commission of life, culture, religious beliefs and identity. A second point is the harm of diversity: different languages back tooth contribute to different shipway of looking at and solvent human problems. Thirdly, less languages does not necessarily mean transgress communication: it could even mean a dangerous line with billions of people fighting against each other, quite an than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the nigh important drawback: as much people speak star language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by school media or aggressive politicians.\n\nHowever, on that point might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. First of all is todays practical problem of reading: business is more(prenominal) difficult, survive is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. Another live problem is marginalization: communities who do not speak a major world language fall behind in science and technology and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. Global collaboration could happen instantly rather than taking years. And finally, although almost people are afraid of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas tooshie survive. We dont speak Latin or classical classical anymore, but the ideas and values of the people who spoke those languages are assuage with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems inevitable that some languages will disappear: kindred animals or plants, they need a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to encompass and isolate ourselves but to be confident about our identity in whatever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the best way to help poor countries?\nWho is wanted most in troupe old or issue? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n economical growth: A firmness of purpose or cause of scantiness? (Short)\n Economic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

No comments:

Post a Comment