From her arrival in 1568, Mary Stuart posed a major threat to the security of Elizabeth and her government

bloody shames arrival in England triggered the discontent among few Catholic sympathisers to become prevalent, as bloody shame provided a clear leader to focus their religious dissatis detailions with the reasonably Protestant solving imposed by Elizabeth. This is why religious motivations rump virtu tout ensembley of the laity were the most insecurityous nemesis from bloody shame. Political advantages from individuals encouraging bloody shame atomic number 18 contri thoory itemors to jeopardize Elizabeth, without the laitys religious motivations however they can non aggregate to a crucial significance.International implications from Marys presence were potentially huge still were never anything more than potential. All these factors revolving just about Mary that curseened Elizabeth were compound by the delegacy Elizabeth mismanaged situations. Mary can be seen as the reception path federal agency in the terror towards Elizabeth, she does not do much herself to ambuscade Elizabeth, however she provided the discontented with the motivation to threaten Elizabeth because she was the next Catholic heir. Those who matt-up discontented about Elizabeths moderate Protestant settlement now had a clear leader to focus their ambitions of a Catholic England.The sumern rise is a prime physical exercise of this religious discontent of many of the laity being focused on releasing Mary to restore universality to England (5600/6000 were individuals not tenants of the lan downhearteders who would induct been pull backd into fighting). The reason why this is the paramount threat to Elizabeth is because of the number of people who had grievances against the religion and precept Mary Stuart as the way to gain their religion back.Tied into this is the political danger of those Nobles who withal had Catholic sympathies scarcely were excessively in a specify to challenge Elizabeth i. e. he Duke of Norfolk who was under demands from Mary Stuart to gain her release from prison by force if needed. Mary was always difference to be the main centre of Catholic plot of lands against Elizabeth because she was the heir to the gage. Catholic dissatisfactions were already present before her arrival but were compounded and given direction with her arrival. Therefore Mary can be seen as the instigator behind the Catholic threat to Elizabeth. This is shown by the fact that until 1568 Elizabeth was relatively free from Catholic threats, however with the arrival of Mary Stuart the query of Elizabeths successor arisen and the Catholic plots began.Moreover with a Catholic heir to the throne available to the Catholics in England then Elizabeths life was under increased threat. This is because the natural Catholics were undoubtedly prepared to kill Elizabeth, their Queen, to gain their religion. After all their lane to heaven or hell was controlled by Elizabeth and if she got it wrong then they would not gain salvation. This individual(prenom inal) threat to Elizabeth is shown by the St Bartholomews Day massacre, where cut Catholics killed their Protestant King in the get to of their religion.This threat is also emphasised by the assassination of William of Orange by Dutch Catholics. Mary be contributes like a catalyst in the Catholic threat to Elizabeth, without her the plots that surrounded her would befool no meaning because there is nobody to restore Catholicism for them. all the same as Mary was in England then repeats of what had happened in France and Spain to Protestant leaders alike(p) to Elizabeth could also happen. Politically Mary Stuart provides an alternative for those Nobles who were not content with their position under Elizabeth.Nobles who were isolated from power under Elizabeth whitethorn see supporting Mary Stuart as a way to gain power in court or getting back positions that they had deprived under Elizabeth. drill of these nobles includes the Earl of Northumberland who under Elizabeth had hi s wardship of the Middlemarch deprived. This plan by Elizabeth to decrease the power of the magnates in the North had loosened the allegiance in the midst of Elizabeth and nobles such as Northumberland to such an issue that they saw pickings a risk on Mary Stuart as being more advantageous than serving under Elizabeth an having their power and prestige slowly eaten away.Once again Mary has not through with(p) anything herself to threaten Elizabeth but inversely her position as heir to the throne has attracted supporters who are willing to threaten Elizabeth, therefore Mary is the main pathway for Catholic threats. Tied in with the threats from isolated Nobles were the threats from within Elizabeths court involving Mary Stuart, which were also very dangerous to Elizabeth. The main court intrigue was the proposed marriage between the Duke of Norfolk and Mary Stuart. This faction came to be mainly because of the fact that they wanted Elizabeth to name Mary as her heir.However this f action contained many powerful Nobles, who it seemed were plotting against Elizabeth around Mary. International threats revolving around Mary Stuart were potentially huge, especially from Spain who at that measure were the major Catholic leaders in Europe. In theory it would be thought that Spain would want to support Mary Stuart onto the incline throne because of her Catholicism. However because Mary Stuart was in the simulation family who controlled France and Scotland, then Spain would rather not have France effectively controlling England as well.Despite the disadvantages of Spain supporting Mary Stuart there are still examples of how Mary Stuarts presence in England gave rise to danger to the security of Elizabeths throne from Spainish involvement, nor could Elizabeth ignore this potentially massive threat. For example the Ridolfi biz which once again aimed to secure Marys release and position on the English throne also included military assistance from Spain, however the p lot was discovered and the troops did not come.Although the military did not come system Spain, Mary Stuarts qualities as a ruler i. e. she is Catholic, once again way of life that these international threats are going to see her as a mover to weaken Elizabeth if not to replace her altogether. Foreign involvement centring around Elizabeth also came from France, after all Mary was half-French and therefore a clear motivation for France can be seen to control England as well. This is shown by the Throckmorton plot were the Duke of Guise was planning to lead an army to depose Elizabeth and place Mary on the throne.Although it failed it shows that Mary was the link between almost all the people who entangle up unhappy with Elizabeths reign from the English laity in the North to some of the French Catholics. She united people who tangle frustrated with Elizabeths reign and those who saw advantages from supporting Mary. The security of Elizabeths throne is definitely challenged here , although it does not go ahead, it is archetype of what can happen, and foreign involvement from the leading two Catholic powers in Europe, i. e. Spain and France in supporting Mary Stuart cannot be taken lightly.Elizabeths mismanagement of situations that may have deflated the threats aimed towards her centring around Mary Stuart made them worse. Politically Elizabeth well-tried to reduce the power of the magnates in the North by setting up councils. This alienated Nobles such as Northumberland from power and therefore distanced the Nobles allegiance to Elizabeth. This is a major factor in why the Revolt of the Northern Earls took place. This would not have been such a problem if not for the fact that Mary Stuart was present in England. She gave the isolated Nobles a chance to avenge their disfavour from Elizabeth.Elizabeth can also be identified in mismanaging the religious settlement to make some Catholics discontented enough to support Mary, a French women, over their own Eng lish Queen. To drive 5400 individuals to a heighten where they felt they had to rebel in the Northern Rebellion must have been down to something Elizabeth did. For example Elizabeth introduced the use of the Protestant prayer Book. Therefore Elizabeth created support for Mary Stuart with her own actions. This increases Marys threat and shows that the security of Elizabeths throne was intensified by some actions taken by Elizabeth.Elizabeth also hampered the security of her own throne by not taking the opportunities to subdue the threat from Mary. This could have easily been done by naming Mary Stuart as her heir, this would have pleased a lot of people and had a lot to commend itself. Including the fact that the Catholic threat, the main threat centring around Mary, would have decreased significantly because they would have been most likely been content with knowing that the next Monarch of England was going to restore Catholicism. However instead Elizabeth hesitated and refused to make her decision by ignoring the subject.For example during the court intrigue she refused to name her heir under significant crush from her court. Once again Elizabeth has intensified the threat orbiting around Mary, not taking the opportunities to relieve the pressure that Mary is placing on the security of Elizabeths throne. Mary Stuarts threat to Elizabeth not only came from the fact that she was the Catholic heir but she did have tremendous political skill and personal magnetism. This is clear to see from the way she manipulated the Duke of Norfolk into trying to secure her release.For example before the Northern Rebellion when Mary met Norfolk and she old him to get her released by force if necessary and Norfolk undoubtedly did what he was told and was involved in a number of plots to release Mary. Cecil knew about Marys personal danger an tried to persuade Elizabeth to have her executed much earlier than she was, however Elizabeth refused, this is another example of how El izabeths indecision over crucial matters failed to sequester the danger of Mary Stuart and is clearly linked to her mismanagement of matters as shown above.Mary Stuarts arrival in England was the instigator in many of the plots against Elizabeth. She was the turning point in the security of Elizabeths throne, from being relatively calm pre 1568, to continuous neckcloth on Elizabeths throne after 1568. Mary herself was not the actual threat to Elizabeth, but she was the motivation for them. Most significantly religious threats orbiting around the fact that Mary was Catholic and placing Mary on the throne were paramount compared to all other motivations.Political factors were contributory to religion and international threats were conceivable but never got off the ground. However Marys overall threat could have been trim down by Elizabeth but of her mismanagement. Nobody troubled Elizabeth more than Mary Stuart in her reign due to the fact that she was the Catholic heir and therefo re Catholics who felt religiously dissatisfied were prompted to threaten Elizabeth.